Velasquez et al v. Peden et al
| Sarah Garrett and Hilario Velasquez |
| Does 1 - 5, City of Cozad and Sgt. John Peden |
| 7:2020cv05007 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Trevor J. Matulka has not registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LKO) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Trevor J. Matulka has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (TCL) |
Filing 13
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 11/9/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Cozad, Does 1 - 5, John Peden (Waite, Terrance) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendants, City of Cozad and Sgt. John Peden, shall have an extension of time to October 8, 2020, to file an answer or other response to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Terrance O. Waite on behalf of Defendant City of Cozad.(Waite, Terrance) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant City of Cozad on 8/19/2020. (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant John Peden on 8/18/2020. (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant John Peden. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendants City of Cozad and John Peden. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested as to City of Cozad regarding Complaint #1 . (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Sgt. John Peden regarding Complaint #1 . (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4215976), by Attorney Maren L. Chaloupka on behalf of Hilario Velasquez, Sarah Garrett(Chaloupka, Maren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
