VanWinkle v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. et al
| Patricia VanWinkle |
| AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc. doing business as AMC Classic Grand Island 7 and Conestoga Realty, LLC |
| 7:2021cv05006 |
| September 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER that this case is stayed until January 3, 2022, pending a determination of whether the decedent's claims will be revived and further litigated by Plaintiff's estate. On or before January 3, 2022, Plaintiff's counsel shall either: 1) move to voluntarily dismiss this case; 2) file a motion to substitute Plaintiff's estate or personal representative as the named Plaintiff in this action; or, 3) file a report advising the court as to whether Plaintiff's estate intends to further litigate this action and the current status of any court proceedings (state or bankruptcy) underway that may impact the progression of this case. Absent timely compliance with this order, the claims filed by decedent may be subject to dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). The clerk shall set a case management deadline of January 3, 2022 to confirm compliance with this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Time to Submit Rule 26(f) Report by Attorney Amanda L. Tobey on behalf of Plaintiff Patricia VanWinkle.(Tobey, Amanda) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Namco Realty LLC, Corporate Parent Namco Realty LLC for Conestoga Realty, LLC. by Attorney Terrance O. Waite on behalf of Defendants Conestoga Realty, LLC, Namco Realty LLC, Namco Realty LLC.(Waite, Terrance) |
|
Filing 8
RESTRICTED CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 10/7/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Conestoga Realty, LLC. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 2 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint by AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., AMC Entertainment Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc., Conestoga Realty, LLC (Waite, Terrance) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against All Plaintiffs from Hall County District Court, Case number CI 21-907 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4470685) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Terrance O. Waite on behalf of American Multi-Cinema, Inc., AMC Entertainment Inc., AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Conestoga Realty, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State District Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Waite, Terrance) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
