Russell et al v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
| Tommy Russell and Debby Valdes Russell |
| C.R. England, Inc., Kevin C. Sims and Out West Express, LLC |
| 7:2023cv05001 |
| July 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Out West Express, LLC on 7/25/2023. (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant C.R. England, Inc. on 7/28/2023. (Chaloupka, Maren) |
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant, C.R. England, Inc., shall have an extension of time to September 20, 2023, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Alexander Arkfeld on behalf of Defendant C.R. England, Inc..(Arkfeld, Alexander) |
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant, Out West Express, LLC, shall have an extension of time to September 15, 2023, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Brian D. Nolan on behalf of Defendant Out West Express, LLC.(Nolan, Brian) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to defendant C.R. England, Inc., Out West Express, LLC, and Kevin C. Sims. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
| Filing 8 Summons Requested as to Kevin C. Sims regarding Complaint #1 . (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 7 Summons Requested as to Out West Express, LLC regarding Complaint #1 . (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 6 Summons Requested as to C.R. England, Inc. regarding Complaint #1 . (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #4 for attorney William E. Hymes. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4900042 by Attorney William E. Hymes on behalf of Plaintiff Tommy Russell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Hymes, William) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney William E. Hymes has not registered for admittance to practice. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4894720), by Attorney Maren L. Chaloupka on behalf of Tommy Russell, Debby Valdes Russell(Chaloupka, Maren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
