Gordon v. Nelson, et al
Larry Gordon |
Ben Nelson and Donald Stenberg |
8:1993cv00263 |
July 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is before the court on Petitioner Larry Gordons "Motion for Certificate of Probable Cause of Appeal," which the court liberally construes as a notice of appeal from the court's Memorandum and O rder dated July 28, 2015. Gordon was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action (see Filing No. 4), so he may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner may proceed on appeal in forma pau peris. To the extent a certificate of appealability is required in order to process this appeal, the court will not issue one because Gordon has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Gordon's 14 Motion for New Trial, 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel, and 18 Motion for issuance of subpoena are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.