Wetzel et al v. Douglas County Housing Authority et al
Case Number: 8:2005cv00163
Filed: April 12, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Motion for Temporary Restraining Order7. Defendants shall continue to pay the housing assistance (including any late fees or other reasonable costs associated with defendants' failure to pay the assistance on a t imely basis) otherwise due the plaintiffs or their landlord until the defendants have afforded the plaintiffs a hearing and a hearing officer that complies with the rules. No security or bond is required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). T he motion for temporary restraining order (filing 7) is granted as provided herein, but otherwise denied. This restraining order shall expire within the time provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) unless extended as provided by that Rule. Kyla Luebbert and Oliver Glass are permitted to appear as law students subject to the provisions of this court's local rules. Signed by Judge Richard G. Kopf on 4/21/2005. (JAR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wetzel et al v. Douglas County Housing Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?