Weaver v. State of Nebraska Police Department et al
8:2005cv00206 |
May 5, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $30.34 by July 1, 2005, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion; in the absence of the initia l partial filing fee by the specified deadline, this case may be subject to dismissal; the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at the plaintiff's institution; plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times, and that all parties are bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and by the court's Local Rules, while this case is pending; and that the plaintiff shall review the "Notice Regarding Summons Forms" attached to this order. Signed by Judge F. A. Gossett on 5/20/2005. (PCV, ) (copy of order sent to institution) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Weaver v. State of Nebraska Police Department et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.