Abraham v. Progressive Insurance (DO NOT FILE DOCUMENTS IN CASE PURSUANT TO FILING #26)
| 8:2005cv00533 |
| December 7, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Warren K. Urbom |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding motion, filing 28 . Abraham's "Motion[s] to Seal Records" filed in Case Numbers 4:99CV3233, 8:01CV580, 8:05CV246, 8:05CV533, and 8:08CV151 are denied. The court directs the clerk's office to file this Memorandum and Order in each of the five cases listed in the caption above. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on Initial Review and granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall send the plaintiff a summons and Form-285 together with a copy of this order. The plaintiff shall, as soon as possible, return the completed summons and 285 form to Clerk of Court for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett on 12/9/2005. (JAR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Abraham v. Progressive Insurance (DO NOT FILE DOCUMENTS IN CASE PURSUANT TO FILING #26) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
