Merry Maids v. WWJD Enterprises et al
Case Number: 8:2006cv00036
Filed: January 27, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Franchise
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion (# 99 ) is granted in its entirety. The Clerk of the court is directed to return the $500.00 bond filed on or about June 23, 2006, to Plaintiff's counsel, Michael Gray, at Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., 500 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402. (Copy given to Financial) Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (TCL)
February 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER to Withdraw Exhibits or to show cause why exhibits should not be destroyed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (MLF, )
January 31, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - A Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by United Sates Magistrate Judge has not been filed. Accordingly,IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to District Judge Laurie SmithCamp for disposition and to Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett for judicial supervision and processing of all pretrial matters. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 1/31/2006. (TJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merry Maids v. WWJD Enterprises et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?