American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. Mail Contractors of America
8:2006cv00239 |
March 1, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
F. A. Gossett |
Lyle E. Strom |
Labor: Reporting/Disclosure |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER granting 48 defendant's Motion for extension of time; defendant shall have until November 15, 2006, to submit additional evidence pursuant to the Court's order of October 18, 2006 47. Ordered by Judge Lyle E. Strom.(MKR ) |
Filing 47 ORDER that the Plaintiff's motion to amend 46 its opposition to defendant's motion for reconsideration is granted; the timeliness issue cocnerning defendant's motion will not be considered. Defendant's motion to stay is granted 44; the Court's order of September 14, 2006, is stayed pending further order of the Court; On or before November 8, 2006, defendant shall submit evidence in the form of addifavits or exhibits with respect to issues set forth within the order; Plaintiff shall have twenty days after service defendant's submission to submit any evidence it wishes address these three issues. Ordered by Judge Lyle E. Strom.(MKR ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. Mail Contractors of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.