Robinson v. Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railroad
| 8:2006cv00322 |
| April 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - Case reassigned to District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon; remains assigned to Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 4/28/2006. (SMS, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall send the plaintiff a summons and a Form-285together with a copy of this order; because the plaintiff is proceeding IFP, the U.S. Marshal will serve the defendant on the plaintiff's behalf. Failure to obtain service on a defendant within 120 days from the filing of the complaint, may result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 4/27/2006. (1 summons and 285 form sent to plaintiff)(CS, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 4/24/2006. (CS, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railroad | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
