Martensen v. Flock et al

Martensen v. Flock et al

Case Number:	8:2006cv00516
Filed:	July 27, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit:	Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 31, 2006	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that filing no. 2, the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by the plaintiff, Kenneth E. Martensen, is granted. The Clerk of Court shall send the plaintiff a standard form for a complaint. By August 25, 2006, the plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint, for which he may use the form provided by the Clerk of Court, and in which he shall set forththe jurisdictional and factual basis for this case, the reasons for the documents he has filed with the court, th e remed(ies) he seeks and any other information he can provide to assist the court in understanding the purpose of this litigation. In the absence of a timely and sufficient Amended Complaint, this action could be subject without further notice to dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 7/31/2006. Complaint form sent to plaintiff as directed. (CS, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 31, 2006

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that filing no. 2, the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by the plaintiff, Kenneth E. Martensen, is granted. The Clerk of Court shall send the plaintiff a standard form for a complaint. By August 25, 2006, the plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint, for which he may use the form provided by the Clerk of Court, and in which he shall set forththe jurisdictional and factual basis for this case, the reasons for the documents he has filed with the court, th e remed(ies) he seeks and any other information he can provide to assist the court in understanding the purpose of this litigation. In the absence of a timely and sufficient Amended Complaint, this action could be subject without further notice to dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 7/31/2006. Complaint form sent to plaintiff as directed. (CS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martensen v. Flock et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?