Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative v. Integrated Distribution Solutions et al
| 8:2006cv00532 |
| August 7, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| F. A. Gossett |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 33 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award and Judgment filed by Integrated Distribution Solutions. The arbitration award is affirmed. Judgment is entered in favor of Retalix and against Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative, Inc., in th e amount of $2,457,948.60, plus interest at the legal rate from 3/26/09, to the date of full payment. Satisfaction of the judgment is noted. Costs in connection with the filing of the application are awarded to Integrated Distribution Solutions, L.L.C. Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative, Inc.'s claims against Integrated Distribution Solutions, L.L.C., and Retalix, Ltd., are dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative v. Integrated Distribution Solutions et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
