DeMonbrun v. Stevens Transport
| 8:2006cv00534 |
| August 8, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER granting 6 and 7 Motions to Amend Complaint. Going forward the complaint shall consist of filing 1 as amended by filing 7. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis subject to the admonitions stated above in this Order. The Clerk of Court shall send the plaintiff a summons and a Form-285 together with a copy of this order. The Marshal shall serve the summons and complaint without payment of costs or fees. Plaintiff shall obtain service on a defendant within 120 days from the filingof the complaint. The plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times while the case is pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett on 8/9/2006. One summons form and one 285 form sent to plaintiff. (JAE, ) Modified on 8/11/2006 to add Magistrate (DKM, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DeMonbrun v. Stevens Transport | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
