Yanouskiy v. Eldorado Logistics System et al
8:2006cv00674 |
October 23, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
F. A. Gossett |
Lyle E. Strom |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the memorandum opinion entered herein this date 86 , Defendants' motion for summary judgment 72 is converted to a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice; and Stoughton's motion for summary judgment 71 is denied as moot without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 84 MOTION for Leave TO FILE DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer. (Attachments: # 1 Defendants' proposed Reply Brief)(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 83 MOTION for Leave TO FILE REPLY BRIEF by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendant Stoughton Trailers. (Attachments: # 1 Stoughton's proposed Reply Brief)(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 82 REPLY BRIEF In Opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 72 by Attorney Andrew H. Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E)(Pillersdorf, Andrew) |
Filing 81 REPLY BRIEF In Opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 71 by Attorney Andrew H. Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy.(Pillersdorf, Andrew) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 78 AFFIDAVIT of STEPHEN S. GEALY FOR INDEX OF EVIDENCE by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer.(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 77 INDEX OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEF DEADLINE by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer.(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 76 OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEF DEADLINE by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer.(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 75 MOTION to Extend Plaintiff's time to respond to Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment 71 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 72 by Attorney Andrew H. Pillersdorf on behalf of Defendants Thunder Transportation, Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer, Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy.(Pillersdorf, Andrew) |
Filing 74 OBJECTION to Plaintiff's Interrogatories and Request for Production by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendant Eldorado Logistics System.(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 73 TEXT NOTICE OF FILING BRIEF AND INDEX ATTACHED TO MOTION and TEXT NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE regarding Motion for Summary Judgment 72 by Deputy Clerk. A Brief and Index shall be electronically filed as two separate documents using the brief event and the index event. The brief and index must identify the document to which it relates. Also, the attorney login does not match the s/signature on this document. This notice is for your information for future filings. (ADB) |
Filing 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Attorney Cynthia R. Lamm on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer. (Attachments: # 1 Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment# 2 Index of Evidence# 3 Copy-Plaintiff's Verified Complaint# 4 Copy-Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint# 5 Copy-Defendants' Answer to Second Amended Complaint)(Lamm, Cynthia) |
Filing 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Attorney Cynthia R. Lamm on behalf of Defendant Stoughton Trailers. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Evidence# 2 Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment# 3 Affidavit of Helen Pillon# 4 Affidavit of Robert Fleischacker with Exhibits# 5 Affidavit of Ed Knoblauch with Exhibits# 6 Exhibit Copy Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint# 7 Exhibit Copy Answer to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint)(Lamm, Cynthia) |
Filing 70 DISCLOSURE Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) by Attorney Cynthia R. Lamm on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Death Certificate# 2 Exhibit Autopsy Report# 3 Exhibit Lease Agreement# 4 Exhibit Bill of Lading# 5 Exhibit Owner Operator Contract)(Lamm, Cynthia) |
Filing 69 DISCLOSURE (Rule 26) by Attorney Jerald L. Rauterkus on behalf of Defendant Thunder Transportation.(Rauterkus, Jerald) |
Filing 68 DISCLOSURE (Rule 26) by Attorney Herbert J. Friedman on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2)(Friedman, Herbert) |
![]() |
Filing 66 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Matthew V. Rusch on behalf of Defendant Thunder Transportation (Rusch, Matthew) |
![]() |
Filing 64 ANSWER to Complaint (PLAINTIFF'S 2ND AMENDED) by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 63 ANSWER to Amended Complaint by Attorney Jerald L. Rauterkus on behalf of Defendant Thunder Transportation Amended Complaint 62 filed by Yuriy Yanouskiy (Rauterkus, Jerald) |
Filing 62 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second) against Defendant all defendants, by Attorney Herbert J. Friedman on behalf of Yuriy Yanouskiy(Friedman, Herbert) |
![]() |
Filing 60 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Attorney Herbert J. Friedman on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Second Amended Complaint)(Friedman, Herbert) |
Filing 59 BRIEF on Issue of Diversity Jurisdiction by Attorney Andrew H. Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D)(Pillersdorf, Andrew) |
![]() |
Filing 57 INDEX IN SUPPORT OF Brief 56 ON ISSUE OF JURISDICTION by Attorney Cynthia R. Lamm on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer.(Lamm, Cynthia) |
Filing 56 BRIEF ON ISSUE OF JURISDICTION by Attorney Cynthia R. Lamm on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer.(Lamm, Cynthia) |
Filing 55 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Attorney Jerald L. Rauterkus on behalf of Defendant Thunder Transportation.(Rauterkus, Jerald) |
Filing 54 RETURN of service of Summons on March 20, 2007 upon Thunder Transportation Co. by Attorney Herbert J. Friedman on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy.(Friedman, Herbert) |
Filing 53 TEXT ORDER granting 51 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer answer due 4/27/2007. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JSF) |
Filing 52 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer 51 by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer.(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 51 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer.(Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 50 NOTICE of Appearance for Cynthia R. Lamm by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer (Gealy, Stephen) |
![]() |
Filing 48 Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendant Thunder Transportation. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (TCL, ) |
Filing 47 Summons Requested as to defendant Thunder Transportation regarding Amended Complaint 46 . (Friedman, Herbert) |
Filing 46 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant all defendants, by Attorney Herbert J. Friedman on behalf of Yuriy Yanouskiy(Friedman, Herbert) |
![]() |
Filing 44 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting /Report of Parties Planning Conference by Attorney Herbert J. Friedman on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy(Friedman, Herbert) |
![]() |
MOTION to Withdraw the law firm of STRONGIN, ROTHMAN and Attorney David Alexander Abrams by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer. This entry corrects filing 42 . (JAE, ) |
Filing 42 NOTICE SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS by Attorney Stephen S. Gealy on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer (Gealy, Stephen) |
Filing 41 SCHEDULING PACKET - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 2/12/2007.Ordered by Judge Lyle E. Strom. (CJP) |
Filing 40 APPLICATION/ORDER admitting pro hac vice Attorney Andrew H. Pillersdorf for Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JAR) |
Filing 39 APPLICATION/ORDER admitting pro hac vice Attorney Gary B. Pillersdorf for Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JAR) |
Filing 38 NOTICE of Appearance of Counsel by Attorney Herbert J. Friedman on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy (Friedman, Herbert) |
Filing 37 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney David Alexander Abrams has not registered for admittance to practice or registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (MKR ) |
Filing 36 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Julio C. Roman has not registered for admittance to practice or registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (MKR ) |
Filing 35 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Andrew H. Pillersdorf has not registered for admittance to practice or registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (MKR ) |
Filing 34 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Gary Pillersdorf has not registered for admittance to practice or registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 32 REPLY to response to MOTION to Dismiss 17 by Attorney David Alexander Abrams on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4)(MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 30 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File response/reply to Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss by Attorney David Alexander Abrams on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer(MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 28 MOTION for Extension of Time to file response/reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 27 by Attorney David Alexander Abrams on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer(MKR ) |
Filing 27 AFFIDAVIT of Andrew H. Pillersdorf in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jursidiction 17 by Attorney Andrew H. Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7)(MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 25 LETTER in response to plaintiff June 30, 2006 letter requesting extension briefing schedule by Attorney David Alexander Abrams on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer(MKR ) |
Filing 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to file response/reply by Attorney Gary Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy(MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 21 Order by Attorney Gary Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy(MKR ) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 20 STATUS REPORT (Letter to Judge Azrack; request to so-order updated briefing schedule) by Attorney David Alexander Abrams on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer(MKR ) |
Filing 19 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Joan M. Azrack: Conference held on 1/9/06. Counsel for parties present. Rulings: Plaintiff may serve limited discovery requests re jurisdictional issue only. To serve by 1/23/06. Briefing schedule adjusted to 30 days from when plaintiff receives defendants responses. (MKR ) |
Filing 18 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss 17 by Attorney Gary Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy(MKR ) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Attorney David Alexander Abrams on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13)(MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 15 LETTER by Attorney David Alexander Abrams to Judge Joan M. Azrack regarding extension of briefing schedule re: defendants' motion to dismiss on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer.(MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 13 LETTER from David Abrams to Judge Joan M. Azrack regarding extension of briefing schedule re defendants' motion to dismiss by Attorney David Alexander Abrams.(MKR ) |
Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Joan M. Azrack: Initial Conference Hearing held on 9/12/05. counsel for parties present. Motion to dismiss set for 10/4/05, 11/18/05 and 12/2/05 (MKR ) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION on Consent to Extend Time to Answer by Stoughton Trailers by Attorney David Alexander Abrams and Julio C. Roman on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System, Ravinder Singh Heer and Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy(MKR ) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Amended Complaint by Attorney David Alexander Abrams on behalf of Defendants Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer, Amended Complaint 5 filed by Yuriy Yanouskiy, (MKR ) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendant Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer.(MKR ) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of David Lupton regarding Amended Complaint 5 by Attorney Julio C. Roman on Ravinder Singh Heer on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy(MKR ) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of David Lupton regarding Amended Complaint 5 by Attorney Gary Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy(MKR ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Service the Amended Complaint by Attorney Gary Pillersdorf on behalf of Plaintiff Yuriy Yanouskiy (MKR ) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Stoughton Trailers, Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer by Attorney Julio C. Roman on behalf of Yuriy Yanouskiy(MKR ) |
![]() |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer in the amount of $ 250;Two Summons issued by Attorney Julio C. Roman on behalf of Yuriy Yanouskiy (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MKR ) |
Filing 2 Letter by Clerk to attorneys of record regarding transfer of case to USDC-Nebraska. (MKR ) |
Filing 1 Transmittal letter (not provided by USDC-NY) with docket sheet transferring case from the USDC-NY, Case Number 1:05cv2202-ENV-JMA. (MKR ) |
Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendants Eldorado Logistics System and Ravinder Singh Heer. (MKR ) |
Remark - Public This case was transferred from USDC-NY on 10/20/06 and received by this court on 10/23/06. (MKR ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yanouskiy v. Eldorado Logistics System et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.