Kellogg v. Nike et al
Plaintiff: |
Gerald A. Kellogg |
Defendant: |
Nike and Nike USA |
Counter Claimant: |
Nike and Nike USA |
Counter Defendant: |
Gerald A. Kellogg |
Case Number: |
8:2007cv00070 |
Filed: |
February 14, 2007 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Office: |
8 Omaha Office |
County: |
Douglas |
Presiding Judge: |
F. A. Gossett |
Nature of Suit: |
Patent |
Cause of Action: |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 28, 2011 |
Filing
404
ORDER regarding MOTION to Enforce Surety's Liability by Executing on Supersedeas Bond 402 - The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of plaintiff's motion, attachments thereto, and this order to: Safeco Insurance Company of America & General Insurance Company of America, 1001 4th Avenue, Suite 1700, Seattle, WA 98154. The surety shall respond to the motion within 14 days of the date of this order, at which time the matter will be considered submitted. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copies mailed as directed) (TEL)
|
January 20, 2010 |
Filing
382
ORDER denying 363 Motion for sanctions; granting 366 Motion for fees and costs; Plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 in the amount of $355,354.00; Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $23,932.00; Plainti ff is awarded $32,401.00 in attorneys fees for the preparation of the application for fees; granting 372 Motion to deem certain filings restricted; A judgment for attorneys fees and costs in conformity this memorandum opinion will be issued this date. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB, ) Modified on 1/21/2010 to add award for preparation of the application for fees (ADB, ).
|
September 30, 2009 |
Filing
360
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiffs renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, or, in the alternative, for a new trial (Filing No. 328) is denied. Plaintiffs restricted motion for attorney fees and to alter or amend the judgment 330 is granted. Kellogg is awarded attorney fees incurred in connection with, and reasonably related to, defending against Nikes counterclaim, including the filing of the motion for fees. Kellogg is directed to file a request for fees, together with supporting d ocumentation, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this opinion; Nike shall have seven (7) days from the date Kellogg files its submission with the court to file any objection thereto. Defendants motion to strike portions of plaintiffs restricte d reply (Filing No. 343 ) is denied Plaintiffs motion to review the actions of the taxation clerk (Filing No. 351 ) is denied as moot. The clerks taxation of costs in the amount of assessment of $61,651.94 (FilingNo. 350 ) is set aside. The courts Judgment (Filing No. 320 ) including costs is vacated. Judgment will be entered this date in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR) Modified on 10/2/2009 to add filing number (MKR).
|
September 12, 2008 |
Filing
286
ORDER sustaining 228 Plaintiff's RESTRICTED MOTION; sustaining 230 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; sustaining 233 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; sustaining 235 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; overruling 239 Plaintiff's M otion in Limine; overruling 242 Plaintiff's RESTRICTED MOTION; granting in part and denying in part 244 Defendants' Motion in Limine; overruling 266 Defendants' Motion in Limine. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SMS, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?