United States of America v. Lots 32 and 33 Linden Estates et al
| United States of America |
| Lots 32 and 33 Linden Estates, 2003 Cadillac Escalade and Lot 2, Linden Estates Replat 5 |
| Anthony Mehner, Barbara Mehner, Danielle Mehner, Mark Mehner, Raymond Mehner, John Prososki and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association |
| 8:2007cv00079 |
| February 23, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Douglas |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER pursuant to the Stipulation 71 and the Order 72 approving the stipulation, this action is dismissed. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER approving and adopting 71 Stipulation. IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation of the parties is approved and adopted; disposition of the defendant property in 8:07CV79 shall be made in accordance with theprovisions of the stipulation therein. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (PCV, ) (cc - US Marshal)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER that on or before September 18, 2009, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully disposeof the case; if the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice; absent compliance with this order, this case (inclu ding all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice in accordance with NECivR 68.1; the deadline to file the proposed final pretrial conference order is terminated, upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (CJP)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER that the stay in this case is lifted; in lieu of a final pretrial conference, counsel and any pro se parties shall prepare a proposed final pretrial conference order in accordance with NECivR 16.2 and submit it to the undersigned magistrate jud ge by August 27, 2009; in the event the court requires additional information or a conference with counsel and any pro se parties, the court will arrange a telephone conference after receipt of the proposed final pretrial conference order; a specific trial date will be set by the court at the time of the filing of the final pretrial conference order.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (CJP)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER that counsel shall file a joint status report concerning the status of this case on July 17,2009, such report to include counsel's position(s) concerning whether the stay should continue in effect or whether the stay should be lifted.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (CJP)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER, This matter is before the court on its own motion regarding the stay in effect in this case. Since trial of the related criminal matter (United States v. Mark Mehner, Case No. 8:07CR83) is not scheduled for trial until March 16, 2009, counsel shall file a joint status report concerning the status of this case on March 27, 2009. ( Status Report due by 3/27/2009.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (PCV, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 64 Joint Motion to Stay. The case shall be stayed until further order of this court. Counsel shall file a joint status report concerning the status of this case on December 31, 2008, such report to include counsel's position(s) concerning whether the stay should continue in effect or whether the stay should be lifted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JAE, )
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER approving 62 the parties' Stipulation. The style of the lawsuit is changed to reflect the 2003 Cadillac Escalade as the only Defendant property. The dismissal is made with prejudice as to any of the Claimants actions orconduct as allege d in the Verified Complaint filed herein. The parties will not seek reimbursement for any costs or attorneys fees they have incurred up to the date of the Stipulation. The United States will immediately release the Lis Pendens it has filed against each of the Defendant real properties. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER, The planning conference set for February 21, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned magistrate judge, which was previously scheduled as a telephonic conference will now be held in chambers, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for each of theclaimants shall attend, in person.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (PCV, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER - On the oral motion of counsel for the parties, the telephone planning conference previously set for February 7, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. is cancelled. ( Telephone Conference set for 2/21/2008 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken.) Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the telephone conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JAE, )
|
|
Filing
8
AMENDED WRIT OF ENTRY granting 7 Oral Motion for Amended Writ. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (1 certified copy to USA)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER for Writ of Entry granting 5 Application for Writ. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (1 certified copy to USA)(ADB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
