City of Omaha v. Figg Bridge Engineers et al
Plaintiff: City of Omaha, Nebraska
Defendant: Figg Engineering Group and Figg Bridge Engineers
Case Number: 8:2007cv00157
Filed: April 26, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice 134 is approved, and the relief requested therein is granted. The Complaint, Amended Complaint, and all claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall pay their own costs and attorneys' fees. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAE)
March 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER granting 132 Motion to Extend. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Defendants Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Filing 132) shallbe granted; and 2. The parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal and submit a draft order to District Judge Laurie Smith Camp, at smithcamp@ned.uscourts.gov on or before April 30, 2009. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
March 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER - 1. On or before April 17, 2009, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to District Judge Laurie Smith Camp, at smithcamp@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order that will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, then the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice; 2. Any motions currently pending are denied wit hout prejudice as moot; and3. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice in accordance with NECivR 68.1. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 4/17/2009.) Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER regarding 124 Motion to Amend; granting 129 Motion to Extend and the Plaintiff shall respond to the Defendant's Motion 124 on or before March 20, 2009. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER regarding 124 Motion to Amend; the Plaintiff shall respond to the Defendant's Motion on or before March 6, 2009. granting 126 Motion to Extend Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT granting in part as follows: The Plaintiff City of Omaha is precluded from offering extrinsic or parol evidence of communications with Figg taking place on or before February 8,2002, in support of the Citys breach-of-contract claims;and the Motion is otherwise denied; 92 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part, as follows:The Court finds as a matter of law that Figg was negligent in its finalcalculation of estimates of the cost of cons truction of the pedestrian bridge;and the Motion is otherwise denied; 106 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion to Continue Defendant Figg Bridge Engineers, Inc.s Motion for Continuance (Filing No.120) is gr anted in part, as follows: The oral argument scheduled for January 26, 2009, is cancelled, and the stayof discovery ordered on October 14, 2008 (Filing No. 104) is lifted;and the Motion is otherwise denied; and4. The parties will contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett forthe scheduling of a planning conference. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
December 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER granting 117 Motion to Extend Time to Reply to Defendant's Brief in Opposition to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 106 . The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendant's response by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before January 8, 2009. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAE, )
November 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER granting 109 Motion to Extend Time; The Defendant shall respond to the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 106 by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before December 18, 2008; and the Defendant shall reply to the Plaintiffs Opposition to the DefendantsMotion for Summary Judgment by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any,on or before December 18, 2008. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
October 14, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER granting 102 Stipulation. Plaintiff shall file its motion for summary judgment no later than 10/29/2008. Discovery is stayed until the district court has ruled on all parties' motions for summary judgment. If necessary, the court will schedule a planning conference after all summary judgment motions are resolved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
September 23, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER granting 97 Motion to Extend; the Plaintiff shall respond to the Defendant's pending Motion for Summary Judgment by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before October 29, 2008. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of Omaha v. Figg Bridge Engineers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Figg Engineering Group
Represented By: Phil B. Abernethy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Figg Bridge Engineers
Represented By: Todd W. Weidemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Omaha, Nebraska
Represented By: Craig F. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?