Gooden v. Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
||Laurence R. Gooden
||Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department, T. D. Gensler, Tracy Brisso and Janice Unknown
||June 29, 2007
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||8 Omaha Office
||Joseph F. Bataillon
|| Pro Se Docket
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 12, 2008
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 31 is granted; a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order; all other pending motions are denied as moot; the Clerk of the court is directed to update the court's records to change the name of Defendant "Janice Unknown" to "Janice Zachar." The Clerk of the court is directed to place the 28USC1915(g)_STR flag on this matter. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (copy mailed to pro se party)(CJP)
|July 3, 2007
GENERAL ORDER 2007-09 concerning the management of pro se cases including supervision of pro se staff attorneys. Except for motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and except for death penalty cases, Judge Kopf is assigned the overall responsibilit y for the management of pro se cases in the District of Nebraska and all previously filed pro se cases referred to Magistrate Judge Gossett or Magistrate Judge Thalken are herewith reassigned to Magistrate Judge Piester. The clerks office shall file this order in each pending case referred to the Pro Se Docket in CM/ECF. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon.(CJP)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?