Gooden v. Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
Plaintiff: Laurence R. Gooden
Defendant: Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department, T. D. Gensler, Tracy Brisso and Janice Unknown
Case Number: 8:2007cv00253
Filed: June 29, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 31 is granted; a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order; all other pending motions are denied as moot; the Clerk of the court is directed to update the court's records to change the name of Defendant "Janice Unknown" to "Janice Zachar." The Clerk of the court is directed to place the 28USC1915(g)_STR flag on this matter. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (copy mailed to pro se party)(CJP)
July 3, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER 2007-09 concerning the management of pro se cases including supervision of pro se staff attorneys. Except for motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and except for death penalty cases, Judge Kopf is assigned the overall responsibilit y for the management of pro se cases in the District of Nebraska and all previously filed pro se cases referred to Magistrate Judge Gossett or Magistrate Judge Thalken are herewith reassigned to Magistrate Judge Piester. The clerks office shall file this order in each pending case referred to the Pro Se Docket in CM/ECF. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon.(CJP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gooden v. Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurence R. Gooden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. D. Gensler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy Brisso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janice Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?