Dempsey v. City of Omaha et al
Plaintiff: Tim Dempsey
Defendant: City of Omaha, Michael G. Fahey, Paul Landow and Tom Marfisi
Case Number: 8:2007cv00311
Filed: August 10, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motion for Summary Judgment 72 submitted by Defendants City of Omaha, Michael G. Fahey, Paul Landow and Tom Marfisi, is granted. Plaintiff Tim Dempsey's Amended Complaint 22 is dismissed withprejudice. Defendants' Motion in Limine 61 is denied as moot. Defendants' Motion to Continue Trial 85 is denied as moot; and The Court will enter a separate judgment. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (KBJ)
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion to Extend Time to File a Response. The Plaintiff's response to the Defendant's motion for summary judgment is due on 10/23/09. The Defendants' reply brief is due on 10/27/09. If the Defendants do not intend to file a reply brief, they should notify the Court accordingly as soon as possible. This case will be ripe for decision on 10/28/09. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting 64 Motion to Extend. The plaintiff is ordered to respond to the defendants' motion in limine 61 by 9/29/09. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER granting 58 Motion to Extend Deadlines, amending the Amended Final Progression Order 47 . Motions in limine due 9/8/2009. Discovery deadline extended to 9/30/2009. Motions for summary judgment due 9/30/2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dempsey v. City of Omaha et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tim Dempsey
Represented By: Jerold V. Fennell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Omaha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael G. Fahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Landow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Marfisi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?