White Cap Construction Supply v Tighten Fastener and Supply, et al
Plaintiff: White Cap Construction Supply
Defendant: Tighten Fastener and Supply, Matt Updike, Mike Neneman, Rich White, Greg Asche, Jason Jarzynka and Bill Shumaker
Case Number: 8:2008cv00264
Filed: June 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1346 Tort Claim

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT granting 214 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. This action is dismissed with prejudice. The parties will pay their own costs and attorney's fees. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)
December 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 207 ORDER - On or before January 3, 2011, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to District Judge Laurie Smith Camp, at smithcamp@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case; and Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (KBJ)
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 196 ORDER granting 189 Motion for Leave to Add Parties and File Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint must be filed and served by 9/20/2010. The final pretrial conference now set for 10/4/2010 is cancelled. The trial now set for the week of 11/9/2010 is cancelled. Joint or separate motions presenting proposed schedules for the completion of discovery are due 10/4/2010. (Case Management Deadline set for 10/4/2010.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
August 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER denying 154 and 160 Motions to disqualify plaintiff's counsel. A party may object to this order by filing an "Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order" within 14 days after being served with the order. The objecting party must comply with all requirements of NECivR 72.2. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
July 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER granting in part 163 Motion to Extend Deadline. Motion hearing held on 7/16/2010. The deposition of defendant, Matt Updike, is no longer stayed. The deposition shall be taken, as soon as is practicable, at counsel's mutual convenience . The parties shall proceed with written discovery, but may not schedule any depositions other than the deposition of Matt Updike until defendants' motions to disqualify counsel 154 & 160 are resolved. Plaintiff shall file its motion for s ubstitution of parties as soon as is practicable. All progression order deadlines, including the plaintiff's expert disclosure deadline, are suspended pending the court's final resolution of the defendants' motions to disqualify plaintiff's counsel. The court will, by further order, direct the parties to submit a proposed schedule after the pending motions to disqualify counsel are resolved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
July 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 165 ORDER regarding 163 Motion to Extend. A Status Conference on the record, with counsel and pro se parties present in person, is set for 7/15/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, Federal Building, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett.Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ARL, )
June 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER granting 155 Motion for Protective Order. Plaintiff may not depose defendant Updike until Updike's related Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Counsel 154 is resolved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (CLS, )
March 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file a first amended complaint 105 is granted. Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint forthwith. A schedule for effecting service of the Amended Complaint will be discussed at the time of the telephonic planning conference on 3/29/2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
January 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER granting 68 Motion to Compel Initial Disclosures; granting 87 Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. Tighton is ordered to serve complete responses to plaintiff's Interrogatories and Requ ests for Production of Documents no later than 1/22/2010. Tighton is ordered to supplement its Rule 26(a)(1)(A) disclosures no later than 1/22/2010. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a), plaintiff is entitled to recover its reasonable expenses (includi ng attorney's fees) incurred in making the two discovery motions. The parties are given until 2/12/2010 to reach an agreement as to the amount of the fee award. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, plaintiff may file a "Motion for Attorney Fees" no later than 3/1/2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
November 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER granting 93 Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines. The Final Progression Order 56 is amended as requested. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, ) Modified on 11/19/2009 sealed in error (ETC).
November 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 92 PROTECTIVE ORDER entered pursuant to Memorandum and Order 91 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
February 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER. The Stipulation of White Cap Construction Supply, Inc. and the Individual Defendants regarding arbitration 49 is approved, and the Individual Defendants' Motion to Stay and to Compel Arbitration 33 is denied as moot. Tighton's M otion to Stay Action Pending Arbitration 36 is denied. White Cap and Tighton may proceed with discovery and depositions in the pending action. Counsel for White Cap and Tighton shall contact chambers no later than 3/5/2009, to schedule a Rule 16 p lanning conference. White Cap shall file periodic status reports concerning the progress of the arbitration proceedings involving the Individual Defendants. The first status report shall be filed by 6/1/2009. Subsequent status reports are due quarterly thereafter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
January 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 SCHEDULING ORDER regarding 49 Stipulation. Defendant, Tighton Fastener & Supply Corp., is given until and including January 27, 2009, to file any response or objection to the Stipulation. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
December 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting 41 Stipulation. The deadline by which the Parties are required to serve their disclosures in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) is extended until 21 days following the court's ruling on defendants' motions to stay (Filings 33 and 36 ). Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
October 20, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting 37 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White Cap Construction Supply v Tighten Fastener and Supply, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: White Cap Construction Supply
Represented By: Marcia A. Washkuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tighten Fastener and Supply
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Updike
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Neneman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rich White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Asche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Jarzynka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Shumaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?