Concrete Washout Systems v. Double D Hook-N-Go Containers
| Concrete Washout Systems |
| Double D Hook-N-Go Containers |
| 8:2008cv00321 |
| July 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Patent Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
CONSENT DECREE that the '288, '767, '633 and '627 Patents are valid and enforceable; the Parties have settled this action by a Confidential SettlementAgreement, and the Parties shall comply with the terms of that agreement; there being no just reason for delay, the entry of this Consent Decree by theUnited States District Court constitutes entry of final judgment as to all remaining claims asserted in this action by any party pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b); CWS and Defendants will each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees; the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Decree and Confidential Settlement Agreement; if any Party shall be alleged to have breached the terms of this Co nsent Decree and/or Confidential Settlement Agreement, any other Party shall have the right to reopen this matter upon motion filed and heard on an expedited basis, including by exparte application. If this matter is so reopened, such Party may pursue any and all remedies it may have against the alleged breaching Party. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (CJP)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER on the parties' joint status report regarding settlement negotiations 104 . The parties request an additional thirty days to continue settlement negotiations. The request is granted. The parties shall file a report of their negotiations on or before April 26, 2010. ( Status Report due by 4/26/2010.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting 94 the Defendant's Motion to Extend the Deadline for filing their reply brief in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity under 35 U.S.C. 103 83 . The deadline for Defendants to file their Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity under 35 U.S.C. 103 will be extended approximately 14 days, until Friday, December 4, 2009. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 86 Motion to Extend. The deadline for Plaintiff to file its Brief in Opposition, and any and all evidentiary materials associated therewith, to Defendants Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is extended to 11/9/09. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting 73 Motion for Leave to File a Surreply Brief; granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. The plaintiff's motion is denied with respect to the proposed defendant Double D Properties, but granted in all other respects. The plaintiff has until September 10, 2009, to file an amended complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 69 Motion to Extend; Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed not later than October 2,2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB, )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER - On the joint oral motion of counsel for the parties, the telephone planning conference previously set for May 8, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. is cancelled and is rescheduled for May 18, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. before the undersigned magistrate judge. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the telephone conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
30
PROTECTIVE ORDER - Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Concrete Washout Systems v. Double D Hook-N-Go Containers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Concrete Washout Systems | |
| Represented By: | James M. Sulentic |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Double D Hook-N-Go Containers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
