Flood et al v. U.S. Marshall et al
| William C. Flood |
| U.S. Marshall and Warden of Douglas County Correctional Center |
| 8:2008cv00333 |
| July 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Douglas |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing this matter without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute. Denying as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the pending petition for habeas corpus 1 is deemed insufficient and the court will not act upon it. By 11/13/08, petitioner shall submit a completely new amended petition that is originally signed under penalty of perjury . The clerk is directed to send petitioner the form AO 241 packet, Petition for Relief from a Conviction or Sentence By a Person in State Custody. The Clerk is directed to set a pro se case management deadline for 11/13/08: deadline for Petitioner to submit amended petition. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party with appropriate form) (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
