Spirit Master Funding III, LLC v Auto Plex of Lincoln, et al
Spirit Master Funding III |
Auto Plex of Lincoln and Chadron L. Gutschow |
8:2008cv00334 |
July 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Contract: Other Office |
XX US, Outside State |
F. A. Gossett |
Laurie Smith Camp |
None |
Diversity |
28:1330 Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER. All pending motions are denied pursuant to NECivR 7.6 without prejudice to refiling in the Bankruptcy Court or in this court after the reference is withdrawn. The hearing previously set for 8/12/2009 on defense counsel's Motion to Withdraw 42 is cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, ) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting 28 Motion to Compel. Defendants are given until the close of business on 5/8/2009 to provide complete responses to all of the plaintiff's interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Plaintiff may file a "Moti on for Attorney Fees," together with an affidavit attesting to the time and expenses incurred in preparing the instant motions to compel, no later than 5/20/2009. Defendants shall serve and file a response, if any, to plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees no later than 6/1/2009, at which time the issue of costs and sanctions will be deemed submitted and a written order entered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.