McGill v. Mukasey et al
||Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Scott R. Baniecke and Warden of Immigration Detention Facility
||August 4, 2008
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||Habeas Corpus (General) Office
||Richard G. Kopf
|| Pro Se Docket
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||U.S. Government Defendant
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 5, 2009
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding pending motions. 1. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (filing no. 14 ) is granted. 2. Petitioner Elario McGill's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1 ) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. 3. All other pending motions are denied as moot. 4. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|October 8, 2008
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 filed by Elario McGill. The court preliminarily determines that Claims One through Three as described in this Memorandum and Order are potentially cognizable. Petitioner's Moti on for Appointment of Counsel (filing no. 2 .) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. By November 21, 2008, Respondents shall file a motion for summary judgment or an answer. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline: November 21, 2008 - deadline for Respondents to file answer or motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed to pro se party and as directed)(JAB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?