United States of America v. $34,000 in United States Currency
United States of America |
$34,000 in United States Currency |
8:2008cv00446 |
October 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Drug Related Seizure of Property Office |
Sarpy |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Thomas D. Thalken |
None |
U.S. Government Plaintiff |
28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: The parties' Stipulation is hereby approved. Seventeen thousand dollars of the Defendant property shall be returned to the Claimant, Mariusz Zeranski, by delivering the same to h er attorney of record, Brent M. Bloom. The Marshal shall deliver said amount by making payment to Brent M. Bloom's Trust Account.The remaining Defendant property,viz.,$17,000.00, is hereby forfeited to the United States. All right, title or interest in or to the Defendant property held by any person or entity is hereby forever barred and foreclosed. The Marshal shall dispose of said $17,000.00 in accordance with law. Upon Mr. Bloom's receipt of the $17,000.00, as mentioned above, he shall file a Receipt for said amount. Upon the filing of said Receipt, this Court shall enter a Judgment in this action. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (1 Certified copy to USM)(TCL ) |
Filing 30 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: The parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court which will fully dispose of the case and provide a copy to the undersigned judge on or before February 15, 2010. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. The nonjury trial scheduled for January 21, 2010, is canceled. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice in accordance with NECivR 41.1. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL ) |
Filing 28 ORDER - Upon the oral request 27 of counsel for the parties, the pretrial conference previously scheduled for December 18, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. is hereby rescheduled to January 7, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL ) |
Filing 19 ORDER - The parties shall report to the court in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before January 5, 2009 or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. $34,000 in United States Currency | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Nancy A. Svoboda |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: $34,000 in United States Currency | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.