Rangel et al v. Union Pacific Railroad
Plaintiff: Robert L. Rangel, Billy C. Hill and Martin Castillo
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad
Case Number: 8:2008cv00469
Filed: October 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Federal Employer's Liability Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Presiding Judge: Lyle E. Strom
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 45:151 Railway Labor Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER that the stipulation for dismissal with prejudice 150 is approved and adopted; this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (CJP)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER - Plaintiff's motion in limine 115 is deemed withdrawn. Defendant's motion in limine 112 to exclude Dr. Andres' testimony is denied, although it will be limited as discussed at the hearing and in this order. Ruling on specific opinions remaining is reserved to time of trial. Defendant's motion in limine 109 is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAE)
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER denying 83 motion to change place of trial. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JDR)
January 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 2/4/2009 at 01:30 PM before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (CJP)
January 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting 90 Motion for Leave; Mainess Gibson and Amy Nilsen of Connelly, Baker, Wotring, LLP, are deemed withdrawn as counsel for defendant. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (CJP)
November 13, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER - The Motion to Withdraw as Attorney 79 is granted; George E.Chandler is deemed withdrawn as counsel for plaintiff. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (KBJ)
October 20, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER ( from USDC-Texas, Eastern District, Case No. 9:07CV211 - TH - JKG ). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie. (JAE, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rangel et al v. Union Pacific Railroad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert L. Rangel
Represented By: John G. Zgourides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Billy C. Hill
Represented By: John G. Zgourides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Castillo
Represented By: John G. Zgourides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad
Represented By: Amy L. Nilsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?