Slupkowski v. United States of America et al
Stanley A. Slupkowski |
United States of America and Duke Terrell |
8:2008cv00471 |
October 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Pro Se Docket |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 11 Motion to Dismiss. Slupkowski's February 5, 2009 Motions (Case No. 8:08CV471, filing no. 11 ; Case No. 8:08CV472, filing no. 11), which the court construes as motions filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 are granted. These matters are dismissed without prejudice. Slupkowski's request to refund the filing fees in these two matters is denied. None of the filing fees paid in either case shall be refunded. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKH) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed defect in the Petition 1 on or before 12/5/08. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the court will send to Petitioner Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party along with an IFP form)(KBJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.