Wells Fargo Insurance Services of Minnesota v. McDermott et al
| Wells Fargo Insurance Services of Minnesota |
| Wayne H. McDermott, Sharon L. McDermott and Diversified BenefitsGroup |
| 8:2008cv00505 |
| November 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Contract: Other Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER OF DISMISSAL that the 28 Stipulation for Dismissal and 30 Stipulation for Dismissal should be approved; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this matter be and hereby is dismissed, with prejudice, each side to bear his, her, or its own attorney fees and costs. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER that upon notification from the parties that a tentative settlement has been reached, the hearing scheduled for 11/19/09 is canceled. Further, the defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 9) in case 8:09CV153 is denied as moot, subject to reassertion if a settlement is not completed. The parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) by 1/18/10. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
24
PROTECTIVE ORDER - Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
