Orr v. Auto Club Group et al
Michael Orr |
Auto Club Group and AAA Nebraska |
8:2008cv00538 |
December 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Douglas |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Lyle E. Strom |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:451 Employment Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the foregoing reasons stated in the opinion, the Court will enter summary judgment in favor of AAA on all of Orrs claims. A separateorder will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion.Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (PCV, ) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting 23 Motion to Amend the Progression Order. Defendant The Auto Club Group, d/b/a AAA Nebraska, shall have until November 23, 2009, to file its motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAE) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's motion to dismiss 7 allegations that plaintiff was retaliated against for complaining of federal law violations is granted, and a claim for retaliation based on such allegations is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant's motion to dismiss 7 is denied in all other respects.Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAE) |
Filing 16 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 5/6/2009 09:00 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (CJP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.