Marksmeier v. Davie et al
Jeffery J. Marksmeier |
Randy Dale Davie, Mark Delmont and Lonnie Schultz |
8:2009cv00030 |
January 21, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Cuming |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant Mark Delmont's Motion for Summary Judgment 11 is granted; Defendant Randy D. Davie's Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is granted; Defendant Lonnie Schultz's Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is granted; and The Court will file a separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (KBJ) |
Filing 52 ORDER granting 17 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, ) |
Filing 40 ORDER - The Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief and Index 39 is denied; and The Defendant's response shall be filed on or before July 14, 2009, in accordance with the local and federal rules. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (KBJ) |
Filing 29 ORDER - Plaintiff Jeffery J. Marksmeier's Rule 56(f) Motion 23 is denied. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant Mark Delmont's Motion for SummaryJudgment 11 on or before July 1, 2009; and Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant Randy Dale Davie's Motion for Summary Judgment 20 on or before July 13, 2009. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (KBJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.