Wetherell v. Dahm
Petitioner: Niccole A. Wetherell
Respondent: John Dahm
Case Number: 8:2009cv00032
Filed: January 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Wetherell's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 23 is granted. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel 24 is denied without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability 28 is denied without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed as directed and to pro se party) (JSF)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner shall have until December 10, 2009, to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability and Brief in support; In the event that Petitioner fails to file a Motion and Brief, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, th e court will deny the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: December 10, 2009: check for filing of Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KBJ)
September 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is granted. Petitioner Niccole Wetherell's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgm ent will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Respondent's Motion to File Replacement Brief 12 is granted. For purposes of this Memorandum and Order, the court considers only Respondent's revised Brief 13 . Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
February 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Niccole A. Wetherell. Petitioner is granted until 3/25/09 to pay the $5.00 filing fee. The clerk is directed to set a pro se case management deadline for 3/25/09: deadline for petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wetherell v. Dahm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Niccole A. Wetherell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Dahm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?