Azike v. Knutdson
Plaintiff: Ugonwa Azike
Defendant: Eric Knutdson and E-Loan
Case Number: 8:2009cv00037
Filed: January 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Truth in Lending Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER that the Plaintiff's oral motion to dismiss its First Cause of Action is granted. Plaintiff's First Cause of Action in the Second Amended Complaint 51 is dismissed without prejudice. The Plaintiff's oral motion to remand all re maining claims to the District Court for Douglas County, Nebraska, is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all steps necessary to accomplish the remand and to close the case for statistical purposes. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)
February 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER SETTING HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE - A Show Cause Hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 2, Federal Building, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska, before Judge Laurie Smith Camp. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JB)
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER RE: TRIAL PREPARATION (Civil Jury Trial). Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JB)
June 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss; denying 35 Motion for Default Judgment. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Plaintiff Ugonwa Azikes Motion for Default Judgment 35 is denied; 2. Defendant E-Loan Inc.s Motion to Dismiss 32 is granted in full; 3. All Plaintiff Ugonwa Azikes claims against Defendant E-Loan, Inc., are dismissed, with prejudice; and 4. The Clerk will amend the caption to remove the reference to Defendant E-Loan, Inc. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )
May 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 15 is denied without prejudice, subject to re-assertion; the Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint 18 isgranted; the Plaintiff's Objection to Motion to Dismiss 19 is denied as moot ;the Plaintiff immediately will file the Amended Complaint that now appears at Filing No. 18-2, without any change, as a separate docket entry; and both Defendants, E-Loan and Eric Knutdson, will respond to the Amended Complaint within the time allowed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (CJP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Azike v. Knutdson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ugonwa Azike
Represented By: John M. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Knutdson
Represented By: Thomas J. Garvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E-Loan
Represented By: Adam J. Prochaska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?