Herzog v. Gibbs/Gibson
Andrew A. Herzog |
Bill Gibbs/Gibson |
8:2009cv00070 |
February 26, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Madison |
Richard G. Kopf |
Pro Se Docket |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (filing no. 34 ), liberally construed as a Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b), is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL) |
Filing 27 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order, 26 . Pursuant to the previous Memorandum and Order entered this date, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until December 30, 2009 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to complete timely service of process. If Plaintiff does not respond, or if good cause is not shown, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: December 30, 2009: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause why service of process was not completed. All pending motions are denied without prejudice to reassertion after service is completed. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 12/30/2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing no. 7 ) is provisionally granted. Plaintiff is not required to pay the filing fee in this matter. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the appropriate officials at the Norfolk Regional Center, where Plaintiff currently resides. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Norfolk Regional Center)(GJG) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint 1 filed on or before April 16, 2009. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without furthe r notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: April 16, 2009: Check for MIFP or payment. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 4/16/2009.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party along with the AO240 form)(GJG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Herzog v. Gibbs/Gibson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew A. Herzog | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bill Gibbs/Gibson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.