Herzog v. Gibbs/Gibson

Plaintiff: Andrew A. Herzog
Defendant: Bill Gibbs/Gibson
Case Number: 8:2009cv00070
Filed: February 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2012 Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (filing no. 34 ), liberally construed as a Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b), is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL)
January 26, 2010 Filing 27 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order, 26 . Pursuant to the previous Memorandum and Order entered this date, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
December 1, 2009 Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until December 30, 2009 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to complete timely service of process. If Plaintiff does not respond, or if good cause is not shown, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: December 30, 2009: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause why service of process was not completed. All pending motions are denied without prejudice to reassertion after service is completed. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 12/30/2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
March 25, 2009 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing no. 7 ) is provisionally granted. Plaintiff is not required to pay the filing fee in this matter. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the appropriate officials at the Norfolk Regional Center, where Plaintiff currently resides. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Norfolk Regional Center)(GJG)
March 16, 2009 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint 1 filed on or before April 16, 2009. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without furthe r notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: April 16, 2009: Check for MIFP or payment. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 4/16/2009.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party along with the AO240 form)(GJG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Herzog v. Gibbs/Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew A. Herzog
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Gibbs/Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?