Jones
Plaintiff: Travistene Jones
Case Number: 8:2009cv00135
Filed: April 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Lyle E. Strom
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1981 Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER - The parties' November 9, 2010, stipulation 90 is adopted. Ms. Crawford, having remitted $2,678, shall remit the sum of two-thousand six hundred and seventy-eight dollars ($2,678), representing the amount remaining due to the defendant under the court's orders of March 1, 2010 (Filing No. 53 - Order; Filing No. 54 - Judgment) and June 29, 2010 (Filing No. 81), to the defendant in three (3) payments over the next twelve (12) months as set out in this Order. Ms. Crawford shall promptly file with the court a verification (notice) of making the payment to the defendant as described herein. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)
August 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER that Terri L. Crawford shall have to on or before September 15, 2010, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court. The show cause deadline will be terminated upon Crawford's filing with the court a verification of making payment to the defendant in the sum of $5,356.00. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
June 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting 78 Motion for Attorney Fees. Omaha Housing Authority is awarded reasonable costs and attorney's fees. Terri L. Crawford shall have forty-five days from the date of this Order to pay the defendant the sum of $3,081, and file verification of payment with the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
April 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER denying 58 Motion for New Trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JAE)
April 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the Order Denying Disqualification of Defendant's Counsel 55 and an Order Imposing Sanctions on Ms. Crawford 55 is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)
February 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 29 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (WMB)
October 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that a telephone planning conference is rescheduled for October 20, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time to schedule this case to trial; Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the telephone conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (CJP)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge - upon consent of parties, this case is transferred to Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken for final disposition.Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)
August 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 9/10/2009 08:15 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (CJP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travistene Jones
Represented By: Terri L. Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?