Langford v. Alegent Health
Plaintiff: Howard Langford
Defendant: Alegent Health
Case Number: 8:2009cv00169
Filed: May 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Warren K. Urbom
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - In accordance with the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal (filing # 72 ), this matter is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)
July 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO QUASH - Gallup's Motion to Quash (filing no. 59 ) is granted. Alegent Health's Motion to Quash (filing no. 51 ) is granted in part and denied in part, in accordance with this Memorandum and Order on Mot ions to Quash. All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by August 2, 2010. Motions to compel discovery shall be filed on or before August 2, 2010. The parties must comply with the provisions of NECi vR 7.0.1 before filing a motion to compel. All dispositive motions shall be filed on or before September 1, 2010. The parties must comply with the provisions of NECivR 7.0.1 and NECivR 56.1 when filing summary judgment motions. The Final Pretrial Co nference will be held before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on December 9, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. The trial date will be set by the undersigned Magistrate Judge at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl Zwart to be held on December 9, 2010. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
May 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Enlarge Progression Order deadlines (filing no. 44 ) is granted. Depositions are due 8/11/10. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/16/2010 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwar t. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl Zwart to be held on December 16, 2010. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (filing no. 33 ) is denied. Depositions due 6/9/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/23/2010 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl Zwart to be held on September 23, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
February 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - No later than March 1, 2010, the plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in Case No. 8:09CV169. The amended complaint shall contain all of the plaintiff's claims, including those presented in Case No. 8:09CV446. Any cla ims not contained in the amended complaint will be deemed abandoned. All further pleadings shall be filed in Case No. 8:09CV169. 2. in the event that the plaintiff files an amended complaint in accordance with this memorandum and order, Case No. 8:09 CV446 will be dismissed. 3. the clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case managementdeadline in this case with the following text: March 1, 2010: deadline for the plaintiff to file amended complaint. 4. the clerk of the court is directed to cancel the deadlines in the courts November 30, 2009, progression order. 5. the plaintiffs Motions to Enlarge Progression Order Deadlines (Case No. 8:09CV169, filing nos. 18 and 28 ), are denied as moot. ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 3/1/2010.), Deadlines/Hearings terminated. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
January 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER. (1)The following matter previously scheduled before the undersigned is herewith referred to Judge Zwart, to wit,(A)Nature of hearing:Pretrial conference.(B)Date and time of hearing: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, at 9:00 am.(C)Place of hearing: Jud ge Zwart's chambers, Room 566, United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall, North, Lincoln, Nebraska.(2)Judge Zwart will issue a report and recommendation or order as is appropriate. (Copy of order mailed to pro se party.)Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Langford v. Alegent Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Langford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alegent Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?