Pou v. Stecher et al
Plaintiff: William A. Pou
Defendant: Joe Stecher, Bruce Gillian, Robert L. Holman, Patrick O'Meara and Ronald D. Lahners
Case Number: 8:2009cv00210
Filed: June 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Warren K. Urbom
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Notice (Other) 26 filed by William A. Pou, and Notice (Other) 25 filed by William A. Pou. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the documents received on this date by the undersigned district judge in this matte r. The plaintiff shall not send any additional documents directly to the undersigned district judge. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in additional sanctions. The undersigned district judge has no fiduciary relationship or responsibility for the plaintiff's financial affairs or this matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
July 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - No payment of a filing fee in the amount of $350 and no request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support of it has been received to date in this case. In accordance with my order dated July 15, 2009, IT IS ORDERED that the case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil Case Terminated. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
July 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. My order of June 30, 2009, remains in effect. Lack of payment of $350 filing fee or of a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support of it by July 23, 2009, will result in dismissal of the matter without further notice. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(EJL)
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is before the court on its own motion. The above-captioned matter has been provisionally filed on June 25, 2009. (Filing No. 1 .) However, due to certain technical defects, the Complaint cannot be further processed until such defects are corrected. To assure further consideration of the Complaint, the plaintiff must correct the defect listed below. FAILURE TO CORRECT THE DEFECT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE PETITION. The plaintiff has failed to include the & #036;350.00 filing fee. The plaintiff has the choice of either tendering the $350.00 fee to the clerk of the court or submitting a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. the plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint on or before July 23, 2009. 2. failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. 3. the clerk o f the court is directed to send to the plaintiff Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. 4. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: July 23, 2009: Check for IFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party along with AO240 IFP Form)(LKH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pou v. Stecher et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William A. Pou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Stecher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Gillian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert L. Holman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick O'Meara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald D. Lahners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?