Montes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Alfredo Montes, Sr. |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 8:2009cv00226 |
| July 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Sarpy |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Plaintiff |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER OF DISMISSAL-The Court, being fully advised in the premises, finds that an Order should be entered in accordance with said Stipulation. The above-captioned action be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice to the filing of any future action, with each party to pay their own costs and with complete record waived. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER - On or before October 6, 2011, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order wh ich will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including a ll counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The trial previously scheduled is cancelled and the defendant's Supplemental Motion in Limine (Filing No. 116 ) is denied as moot upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on the parties' cross-motions summary judgment 38 and 39 . The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 38 ) is denied. The defendants motions summary judgment (Filing No. 39 ) is denied. The defendant' ;s motion to strike (Filing No. 77 ) is denied as moot. The plaintiffs motion for leave to supplement his brief (Filing No. 92 ) is granted. The plaintiffs motion for leave to file supplemental exhibits (Filing No. 93 ) is granted. The plaintif fs objections to correspondence to the court (Filing No. 94 and Filing No. 97 ) are overruled. Pursuant to the Order dated December 17, 2011 (Filing No. 91 ), the parties shall have ten (10) days from the date of this order in which to schedule a final pretrial conference. Counsel for the plaintiff shall contact the magistrate judge to schedule the final pretrial conference. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the defendant's 48 Motion in Limine (Daubert). Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 45 Motion to Compel. The defendant shall until November 30, 2010, to provide supplemental discovery. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 59 the Plaintiff's Stipulation to Extend deadlines. Plaintiffs brief in opposition to Defendants Motion in Limine (Daubert) is due on Monday, November 1, 2010. Defendants reply brief is due November 11, 2010. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 54 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff's brief in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is due Monday, November 1, 2010. Defendant's brief in opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due Monday, November 1, 2010. Plaintiff's reply brief is due Friday, November 19, 2010. Defendant's reply brief is due Friday, November 19, 2010. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 28 Stipulation for extension of progression deadlines; deposition deadline 10/27/10; final pretrial conference 12/17/10 at 11:00am before Magistrate Judge Thalken; jury trial 1/17/2011 before Judge Bataillon. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Montes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alfredo Montes, Sr. | |
| Represented By: | James L. Cox, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
