Duncan v. County of Dakota et al
Plaintiff: Toni Duncan
Defendant: County of Dakota, James L. Wagner, Dakota County Sheriff and Rodney Herron
Case Number: 8:2009cv00277
Filed: August 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The county defendants' motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 49 ) is denied. Defendant Rodney Herron's motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 52 ) is denied. Defendant James L. Wagner's motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 55 ) is granted. The plaintiff's claims against James L. Wagner in his individual capacity are hereby dismissed. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER denying plaintiff's motions for extension of time (Filing Nos. 58 , 61 , and 63 ). The plaintiff shall have to on or before November 29, 2010, to file responses to the defendants' motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 49, 52, and 55). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
April 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER that the parties shall meet and confer and report to the court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 by 4/21/2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
October 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Extend. The parties shall have twenty (20) calendar days from the date an order is filed on the currently pending motion to dismiss 19 , in which to file a planning report with the court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), if necessary. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (PCV, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duncan v. County of Dakota et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toni Duncan
Represented By: Dewey P. Sloan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Dakota
Represented By: Vincent Valentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James L. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dakota County Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodney Herron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?