Castonguay v. Sayles
Plaintiff: Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Defendant: Chelsea Sayles
Case Number: 8:2009cv00317
Filed: September 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The filing fee shall be collected and remitted, as funds exist. The Clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order on the appropriate financial officer at Plaintif f's current institution. The Clerk of the court shall also provide the Court of Appeals with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 17 is denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(JAE)
December 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff is permitted leave to appeal in forma pauperis; Plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.00 by January 16, 2010,unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion; After pa yment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiffs institution shall collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and shall forward those installments to the court; and The Clerk of th e court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiffs institution and to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (copy mailed to institution as directed) (ADB, )
December 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's claims against Chelsea Sayles are dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; and A separate Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
October 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee shall be collected and remitted, as funds exist, in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Until the full filing fee of $350.00 is pai d, the prisoner shall be obligated to pay, and the agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward to the Clerk of the court, 20 percent of the preceding month's income in such months as the account exceeds $10.00. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(copy mailed to institution) (ADB, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Castonguay v. Sayles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chelsea Sayles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?