Evans v. Shortridge

Evans v. Shortridge

Petitioner:	Joel R. Evans
Respondent:	Karan Shortridge
Case Number:	8:2009cv00340
Filed:	September 23, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
County:	Douglas
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 23, 2009	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
November 5, 2009	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1) Upon initial review of the Petition 1 , the court preliminarily determines that Petitioners claim is potentially cognizable in federal court. 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. 3. By December 19, 2009, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is dir ected to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 19, 2009: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of the court is directed to s et a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 18, 2010:check for respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party, Respondents and Ne. Attorney General)(PCV, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 23, 2009

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)

November 5, 2009

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1) Upon initial review of the Petition 1 , the court preliminarily determines that Petitioners claim is potentially cognizable in federal court. 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. 3. By December 19, 2009, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is dir ected to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 19, 2009: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of the court is directed to s et a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 18, 2010:check for respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party, Respondents and Ne. Attorney General)(PCV, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. Shortridge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Joel R. Evans
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Karan Shortridge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?