Lewis v. Kinze Manufacturing, Inc.
| 8:2009cv00442 |
| December 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER - On or before October 29, 2010, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The trial previously scheduled is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 43 , Defendant's Motion in Limine. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
53
AMENDED PRETRIAL ORDER granting 51 Motion for Order Nunc Pro Tunc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Kinze Manufacturing, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
