Lewis v. Kinze Manufacturing, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2009cv00442
Filed: December 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER - On or before October 29, 2010, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The trial previously scheduled is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG )
October 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER denying 43 , Defendant's Motion in Limine. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)
September 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 AMENDED PRETRIAL ORDER granting 51 Motion for Order Nunc Pro Tunc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Kinze Manufacturing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?