Denenberg v. LED Technologies
Plaintiff: Steven M. Denenberg
Defendant: LED Technologies, LLC
Case Number: 8:2009cv03182
Filed: August 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 504 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Sanctions (filing 134 ) is denied. Plaintiff shall pay Defendant the amount of $3,512.48 in connection with the court's October 7, 2011 order (filing 132 ). Said amount shall be paid or offset at the time of final judgment in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA)
October 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER - Defendant's Second Motion for Sanctions, or in the Alternative, Second Motion to Compel (filing 115 ) is granted, in part. Plaintiff shall submit signed, sworn and complete responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3, 5, 7 and Request for Produc tion of Documents Nos. 6, 9, 13 and 16 by October 17, 2011. Failure to do so will result in the imposition of severe sanctions and potential dismissal of this suit. Defendant is entitled to an award of costs and attorney's fees incurred in bring ing its Second Motion for Sanctions, or in the Alternative, Second Motion to Compel (filing 115 ). The parties shall be heard on the matter of costs as follows: a. Defendant shall file an application for attorney's fees, together with an affida vit attesting to the time and expenses incurred in preparing its Second Motion for Sanctions, or in the Alternative, Second Motion to Compel, on or before October 21, 2011. b. Plaintiff shall serve and file a response, if any, to Defendant's app lication for attorney's fees on or before November 4, 2011, at which time the issue of costs will be deemed submitted and a written order entered. Plaintiff shall pay Defendant the amount of $3,763.99 in connection with the court's Ju ne 27, 2011 order (filing 85 ). Said amount shall be paid or offset at the time of final judgment in this case. A status conference will be scheduled, if necessary, following the court's ruling on Defendants Motion to Dismiss (filing 68 ). Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will continue to be held in abeyance. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG, )
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's motion for sanctions (filing 65 ) is granted, in part. Plaintiff will be ordered to pay a reasonable portion of the costs Defendant incurred in bringing this motion. Defendant shall file an itemization of costs associated with this motion on or before July 11, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG)
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 45 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall serve complete responses to all of Defendant's discovery requests no later than April 15, 2011. If plaintiff fails to do so, the defendant may file a motion for the court to impose sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2). Plaintiff's Motion to Join Party Defendants (Doc. 54 ) is denied. Plaintiff's reply brief (Doc. 56 ) is disallowed and is stricken from the record. Defendant's Motion for leave to file a surreply brief (Doc. 58 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG)
September 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 36 PROTECTIVE ORDER, granting 35 Joint Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )
October 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting 8 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; The appearance of Peter C. Lemire and the firm Leyendecker & Lemire, LLC, is hereby deemed withdrawn. The court will terminate future notices to Mr. Lemire in this case. For purposes of this case, Peter C. Lemire is excused from registering for admittance to practice in this district and registering for the court's CM/ECF System. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (ADB, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denenberg v. LED Technologies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven M. Denenberg
Represented By: Norman Denenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LED Technologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?