Flott et al v. Hair Salons, Inc. et al
8:2009cv03211 |
October 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Labor: Fair Standards Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 51 Plaintifs' Motion for Attorney Fees. Class Counsel are awarded $14,500.00 as reasonable fees, expenses and administrative costs to be paid by defendant Hair Salons, Inc., pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAB) |
Filing 33 ORDER - Telephone Planning Conference set for 5/14/2010 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the telephone conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JAE) |
Filing 32 ORDER regarding 31 Motion to Extend time to certify class. The deadline to allow any motion seeking certifications of this case as a class action is extended to May 5, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Change Place of Trial to the Omaha Division. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flott et al v. Hair Salons, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.