Newkirk et al v. Conagra Foods, Inc. et al
| Larry I. Newkirk and Ruth A. Newkirk |
| Chr. Hanson Inc., Conagra Foods, Inc., John Does 2-20 and Symrise, Inc. |
| McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C. and Sandra D. Morar |
| 8:2010cv00022 |
| January 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| F. A. Gossett |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER granting 1 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas; granting 26 and 43 Motions to Seal; denying 48 Motion to Strike ; denying 47 and 49 Motions for Leave to File Surreply Brief. A party may object to this order by filing an "Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order" within 14 days after being served with the order. The objecting party must comply with all requirements of NECivR 72.2. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER - The Order to Show Cause filing 57 is deemed satisfied. The Motion to Withdraw as Attorneys (Filing 58 ) is granted. Attorneys Scott A. Britton-Melhlisch and Richard C. Eymann are granted leave to with draw as counsel for the plaintiffs. The Clerk shall terminate the appearances of Gregory J. Arpin and Andrew J. Mitchell as counsel for ConAgra Foods, Inc. in this matter. For purposes of this case, attorneys Scott A. Britton-Melhlisch, Richard C. Eymann,Gregory J. Arpin and Andrew J. Mitchell are excused from registering to practice in the District of Nebraska and from registering for the court's CM/ECF System. The Clerk shall terminate future notices to attorneys Scott A. Britton-Melhlisch, Richard C. Eymann, Gregory J. Arpin and Andrew J. Mitchell in this matter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that on or before 5/10/2010 attorneys Scott A. Britton-Mehlisch, Gregory J. Arpin, Andrew J. Mitchell and Richard C. Eymann shall register for admittance to practice and register for the System or show cause by written affidavit w hy they cannot comply with the rules of the court; the clerk shall mail a copy of this order to attorneys Scott A. Britton-Mehlisch, Gregory J. Arpin, Andrew J. Mitchell and Richard C. Eyman at their last known addresses as ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (Copies mailed as directed) (SED)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER that the motion of Symrise, Inc. (Filing 51) is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall correct the records of the court and shall remove Grant Josiah Silvernale, III, Brendan Murphy, David E. Kawala, and Alison B. Crane, as attorneys of record i n this action. Filings 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , and 24 are stricken, as Symrise, Inc. is not a party to the pending discovery dispute, and its attorneys are not required to register for admittance to practice in this district. Nor is Symrise, Inc. r equired to file any corporate disclosure statement in this matter. On the court's own motion, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: The Clerk of the Court shall remove Christopher William Angius as counsel of record in this action because Chr. Hanson, Inc. is not a party to the pending discovery dispute, and its attorney is not required to register for admittance to practice in this district. Chr. Hanson, Inc. is not required to file any corporate disclosure statement in this matter, and filings 21 , 22 , and 25 are hereby stricken. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (ADB, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
