Brehm v. Trowbridge, et al
8:2010cv00064 |
February 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 ORDER approving the parties' Joint 87 Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and the parties will pay their own costs and attorney's fees. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR) |
Filing 86 ORDER - On or before August 15, 2011, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to District Judge Laurie Smith Camp, at smithcamp@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (TCL ) |
Filing 79 ORDER RE: TRIAL PREPARATION (CIVIL JURY TRIAL). Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JB) |
Filing 75 ORDER denying 50 the Defendants' Motion to Compel Response to Discovery Request. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR) |
Filing 69 ORDER granting 68 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Joshua C. Dickinson and Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP are allowed to withdraw as counsel for defendants. Defendants continue to be represented by other counsel. The Clerk of Court shall stop all electronic notices to Joshua D. Dickinson and the Spencer Fane law firm regarding this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (ARL, ) |
Filing 48 ORDER granting 46 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Discovery Deadline filed by Dana Trowbridge and City of David City. The final case progression order 36 is amended to provide that the deposition and discovery deadline is extended from March 18, 2011, until April 17, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, ) |
Filing 34 ORDER - The Defendants' Motion to Strike (Filing No. 31 ) is granted to the extent that statements in the Affidavit of Vincent Brehm, Filing No. 27 , paragraphs 4 and 8, are not given any weight to the extent that they purport to represent the state of mind of Defendant Trowbridge; and The Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 19 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (AOA) |
Filing 23 ORDER striking the First Amended Complaint 22 filed by the Plaintiff. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. A party may object to this order by filing an "Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order" within 14 days after being served with the order. The objecting party must comply with all requirements of NECivR 72.2. (MKR) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Recusal Request for Reassignment. This matter is before the court on the court's own motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 455(a), which states: "Any... judge... of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in whi ch his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Upon review of the parties and the record in the above-designated case, the undersigned judge shall, and hereby does, recuse himself from the above-designated case pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 455(a).SO ORDERED. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (PCV, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brehm v. Trowbridge, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.