Doe v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska et al
Case Number: 8:2010cv00085
Filed: March 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Warren K. Urbom
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - the plaintiffs Motion to amend 42 is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to file the Amended Complaint as a separate document which will be the operative complaint in this matter; the defendants Motion to Dismiss [29 ] is denied, in accordance with this memorandum and order; the defendants shall have until September 15, 2010, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the plaintiffs Amended Complaint; and The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: September 15, 2010: deadline for the defendants to file an answer or other responsive pleading. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?