Williams v. Rehtmeyer et al
Defendant: City of Omaha Planning Department, Robert Peters and John Rehtmeyer
Case Number: 8:2010cv00092
Filed: March 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (filing no. 57 ) is granted. The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 19 Motion for TRO; denying 26 Motion for Sanctions; denying 30 Motion to Compel; denying 31 Motion to Secure In Forma Pauperis Status. The court will enter a separate progression order progressing this case to final disposition. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (filing nos. 10 and 14 ) are denied without prejudice to reassertion in a motion for summary judgment. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants shall file their answer no later than 14 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. A separate progression order will be entered progressing this matter to final disposition. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG )
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants may proceed and service is now warranted. The Clerk shall send 3 summons and 3 USM-285 forms to plaintiff together with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk is directed to set a Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 7/28/2010: Check for completion of service of summons. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with forms) (JSF)
March 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER provisionally granting 2 the plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Rehtmeyer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Omaha Planning Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Rehtmeyer
Represented By: Cheryl D. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?