Estate of David N. Osborne v. Limoges et al
Plaintiff: Estate of David N. Osborne
Defendant: M. Kathleen Brewer, Estate of Elizabeth Osborne and E. Diane Limoges
Case Number: 8:2010cv00164
Filed: April 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE granting 62 Stipulation for Dismissal. Plaintiff's claims against the Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JSF)
January 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER upon notice of settlement, on or before January 20, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The trial previously scheduled is cancelled and all pending motions are terminated upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER denying 58 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Witness List Instanter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
June 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motion to dismiss (Filing No. 26 ) is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)
September 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Extend. The plaintiff shall have until November 12, 2010, to respond to the defendants' motion to dismiss 11 . The plaintiff shall initiate a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge within ten (10) business days following the court's ruling on the defendants' motion to dismiss. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estate of David N. Osborne v. Limoges et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Kathleen Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estate of Elizabeth Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Diane Limoges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estate of David N. Osborne
Represented By: Aaron F. Smeall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?