Brown v. Providence Medical Center et al
Plaintiff: Jeff Brown
Defendant: Benjamin Martin, M.D., Mercy Medical Clinics and Providence Medical Center
Case Number: 8:2010cv00230
Filed: June 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER denying 197 Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider and Amend Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JB)
October 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 192 AMENDED ORDER - The plaintiffs' Request to Alter Trial Date (# 189 ) is denied. The deadline for the filing of non-expert motions in limine is extended to October 17, 2011. The plaintiffs are given until October 17, 2011 to file their objection to defendant Martin's Motion in Limine (# 177 ). The pretrial conference will be rescheduled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA)
September 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER - Defendants' Motion to Compel (filing 139 ) is granted. To the extent necessary, Plaintiffs shall supplement their discovery responses in accordance with their obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) by or before October 4, 2011. Plain tiffs shall amend their expert disclosures of healthcare providers so as to comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C) by or before October 4, 2011. Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order (filing 147 ) is granted, in part. The depositions of Plaintiff Sherri Gothier's minor sons shall each be limited to one hour in duration. In all other respects, Plaintiffs' Motion is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (TEL)
June 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER pursuant to the Qualified Protective Order 115 . IT IS ORDERED: Counsel's oral request for a telephonic hearing is denied. Should the parties wish to have ex parte communications with KB's health care providers, notice shall be giv en as follows: a. Prior to any ex parte communication, the party desiring such communication must give the other party three (3) business days notice. The notice must be in writing and must specify the health care provider(s) that will be contacted. b. Notice shall be given seriatim. Each notice may only specify seven (7) health care providers that will be contacted. No more than one, written notice may be given per day. c. Prior to conducting an ex parte interview of a health care provider ( in person or otherwise), the party requesting the ex parte communication must send the provider, via postal mail, email or facsimile, a copy of the Qualified Protective Order. A copy of the Order may not be sent to the provider, however, until the expiration of the three-day advance notice period as set forth above. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (TEL)
June 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 115 QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 82 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG)
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 114 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motion for a qualified protective order 82 will be granted upon the submission of a proposed protective order which is modified as discussed herein. The modified proposed order must be submitted to the court by or before June 13, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (KBJ)
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER regarding 82 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order. Defendants are given until 3/28/2011 to either (1) report to the court that the motion is unopposed, or (2) supplement their motion with all the information required by NECivR 7.0.1(i). (Case Management Deadline set for 3/28/2011.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )
November 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part the Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint 38 as follows: Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Complaint, in compliance with this Memorandum and Order, on or before 11/12/10. In the abse nce of the filing of a Second Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs' claims will be dismissed, without prejudice to refiling in state court. The Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 29 and 31 and the Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike 45 are denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Providence Medical Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeff Brown
Represented By: Ronald J. Palagi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin Martin, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercy Medical Clinics
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Providence Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?